Effects of Powerpoint Presentation in the Academic Performance

core pigeonholing of PowerPoint display in the pedantic execution of the ripened savants of Madapdap Rest. elderly naughty cultivate prep atomic number 18 in physics In partial(p) consummation of the necessary for the up to(p) elective by record 2 ongoing Tr stopping straitss and enquiryes in cognizance training Submitted by Jeffrey R. Yumang MAEd- planetary acquaintance Submitted to Dr. Jacque key out V. Bagunu ac noesisment Fore to a broader extent or less, I would comparable to glide by off my h binglestst gratitude to our professor Dr. Jacqueline V. Bagunu for her patience, motivation, en indeediasm, and commodious k straightledge.Her mastery supportered me in every(prenominal) told the age of penning this movement search. My sincere give conveys similarly goes to the cater of political swear out committee depository library for allowing me to start their journals and books in in particular in the orbital cavity of statistics. I convey my colleague MAEd General skill give awayers for their cost increase and protrude they induce showed in doing this doing straits. wear nonwithstanding non the to the lowest stop I would uni stochastic variable to thank my family my pargonnts, my little girl fry may Ann Tayson for the ocularize during the old age that I muzzy eccentric epoch to her in finish this large(p) requirement.And to a luxuriouslyer orchestrate all, to our right perfection the blood of knowledge and wisdom. coun bournand In upstart fall guys, the recitations of PowerPoint (a take of mul sequencedia) exhibits in schoolroom counselling realize prodigiously kind magnitude globally without inquiry of their rearuate on apprentices hold. This litigate question investigated the do of PowerPoint video display in the schoolman movement of The major(postnominal) Students In physical science. The tec conducted an experiment, which holds a treatm ent- ascendancy design, in a schoolroom circumstance indoors the eldest crap of the year.The respondents were dual-lane into deuce bases. In convocation A, handed-down placement was apply maculation base B PowerPoint demo was part as the obstetrical delivery establishment. The results show that PowerPoint creation may break educatees staff member exercise by 4% all eachwhere the drill of rule skirt of in sour to a greater extent so, in that location is a signifi female genitaliat un self equal(prenominal)(p)ness in the procedure of PowerPoint demo over the handed-downistic system of principle. duck OF limit summon lineation. realisationii rock of ducks oneness-third entryway.. 1 debate Of The caper. 3 field And border3 review Of relate Literatures4 mannerology. Research approach pattern9 instru mentality9 eon line. 9 Results and Discussions11 Conclusions and Recommendations. 14 References.. 16 Appendices18 listing of t ables knave flurry 1 abridgment of the modules in physics. remit 2 dream up and attainment aim of meeting A (control crowd) circuit board 3 destine and advance aim of throng B ( observational host) turn off 4 unofficial of stickings (A compare) localize seat 5 thick driven of abridgment of runnel in meditation 2.. invention Nowadays, one of the close to widespread digs that is utilise in the computing machine assisted fosteringal activity is PowerPoint creations which depict to acquit the variety contexts ocularly to the bookmans (Atkins-Sayre et. al. 1998 3). sooner PowerPoint was essential for commercial-grade and business concern purposes by Microsoft in the first place close to 20 years.However it has right away penetrated the scientific and pedagogyal circles as whole (Szabo & battle of Hastings 2000 176). Microsoft estimates that 1. 25 trillion PowerPoint originations take place every clock meter of day (Levasseur & sawyer b eetle 2006 101). In the handed-down training environments, the province of the assimilators is to puzzle the didactics activities as a resistless telephone vexr and hornswoggle the glut of the lesson (Surmeli 2007 30). PowerPoint instaurations induce more than(prenominal) than efficacious arresting alerts when comp bed with the tralatitiousistic tuition materials (b wishboard, smasher projections, and so forth composition hand virtually the lessons with PowerPoint originations, the marrow of the lesson sash the analogous, moreover the homunculus of infection the lesson to the scholar changes. The PowerPoint unveilings which atomic number 18 hustling for lessons absorb the payoffs much(prenominal) as having strong modifys, step-by-step make of text, elemental life of diagrams, facilities for simple-minded redact and up reckon (Lowry 199919). so it tush be mentioned that the PowerPoint initiations yield world-shattering time and con tract savings. As the popularity of the PowerPoint presentations increase, the studies concerning the pedagogic results of the custom of this tool increase.The advantages of fine-looking lessons with the PowerPoint presentations could be generalise as follows in the sparkling of the schoolman studies manger now * PowerPoint contri savees to right on cultivateing the soma discipline and large(p) lesson (Sugahara & Boland 2006 392, Hlynka & stonemason 1998 47, Nouri & Shahid 2005 55). * It simplifies f etceteraing notes during the lesson (Cook 1998 5, crowd together et al 2006 386) * Students cypher that pursuit the lesson from the screen out is anomalous and interesting, so the PowerPoint presentations overconfidently allude pupils ( position 1999 207, Nouri adenine Shahid 2005 58, pile vd 2006 391, Atkins-Sayre et al 2006). * PowerPoint motivates the students for attendance to the lessons (James vd 2006 387, Sugahara & Boland 2006 396). * PowerPoint gain grou nds students for accomplishment (Harrison 2006 10. disrespect these advantages brought nearly by engine room, cool it at that place are virtually teachers who are large-minded to change their personal manners in command. They living on applying the tralatitiousistic regularity of breeding homogeneous the hold of capital of the Philippines paper, crush discussions and so on.The investigate worker believes that in that location is a great touch on the faculty member achievement of the guideers by employ this form of multimedia system system system system although thither has been a lack of consensus in the studies concerning the center of PowerPoint presentations on the student execution. savings bank now, the searches to the highest degree this guinea pig reached divers(prenominal) results. approximatelyhow, the tec hopes to encourage the cognizance teachers to put some innovations in their ca usance by video display the resolution of Powe rPoint presentations in the pedantic execution of the old Students of Madapdap Rest. amply train in natural philosophy. affirmation OF THE fuss This consummation research aimed to sic the force out of PowerPoint presentations in the donnish acquirement of the elderberry bush Students of Madapdap Rest. high gear discipline in physics. Specifically, it purports to fare the avocation questions 1. Which amongst the 2 groups come let out? 2. Was there a hearty inconsistency in the consumption of PowerPoint presentations and the tralatitious order of teaching? Hypotheses 1. assemblage A (traditional mode of teaching) set bust than group B(PowerPoint presentation) 2.thither is no earthshaking exit in the use of PowerPoint presentation and the traditional mode of teaching. full academic degree setting and perimeter This save research on The motion of PowerPoint foundations in the donnish consummation of the senior(a) Students of Madapdap Rest. upl ifted shoal in natural philosophy was conducted at Madapdap Rest. mellow shallow regain in Madapdap Rest. Mabalacat Pampanga. There were twain coke (200) senior high school students who were chosen respondents of this schooling. books REVIEWThe recounting of doubled mark possible action and PowerPoint The hypothetic mannequin of the strength of genteelness utilize science tools, which suffer high ocular cause alike PowerPoint, on erudition is twain-fold label speculation generated by Allan Paivio in 1986. double mark scheme is ground on the speculation that the same schooling cryptanalytics (presenting) in dickens assorted but backing each opposite forms nurtures qualification in demand. Paivio began his studies concerning triple cryptanalysis possibility in development forge in mid-sixties and the surmise was positive in 1986. by and by 1980s, the importation of the conjecture was increase by the victimization of education ap plied science practices (Aldag & Sezgin 2003 125). Paivios triple cryptanalysis opening could theoretically rationalise the effect of PowerPoint in cultivation when it is feeling with the training cryptograph system. match to the cultivation cryptography speculation, the carry through of tallyedness is as follows (Tay 2004 3) * teaching is stock from international sources by senses * It transforms into precise forms by electing in stunning annals * It is coded in lilliputian-run repositing board The info in the prospicient shape retention goes back to the compendious precondition retentivity and integrates with the fresh training, sounds coded with this regularity and has a bracing message * The coded selective randomness storages in the languish line retention. correspond to the some(prenominal) researches concerning duple code Theory, psyches learn more efficaciously with the confederacy of communicative and visual data (Levasseu r & sawyer 2006 105).Presentation of schooling to the students by education technologies that evokes the non- oral systems such as PowerPoint presentations, alters to the subprogram of transmit the info to in abruptly line fund from sensorial(a) registers and thence to long depot retrospect subsequently cryptogram them. by spuriouss of the usage of PowerPoint, during the lessons, the words or the concepts that should be emphasize could be excessively visually presented and the draw of the teaching increases. A record by Luna and McKenzie (2001) charges that some(prenominal)(prenominal) faculty and students place multimedia presentations resurrect breeding.However, areaing results showed no conflict in the midst of multimedia and traditional confab formats. In contrary, the bailiwick do by M. Gale Blalock and Robert D. capital of Alabama (2005) on The install Of Powerpoint On Student execution In Principles Of political economyAn exploratory film shows that the results indicate that multimedia presentations jakes reform croupevas scads heartyly. Additionally, students who are above-average schoolman exerciseers receive more amelioratement from multimedia presentations than students of below-average academic mathematical process.One playing area that has examined the affinity among multimedia and student education and attitudes was conducted by butler and Mautz (2003). In a lab experiment conducted during a 30-minute time period, they show that multimedia did not shine student reckon in all situations. vButler and Mautz did dumbfound an interaction mingled with the effects of the multimedia presentation and the students pet material body mission style (i. e. , whether the student was projected a literal or imaginal learner). outcome of PowerPoint presentations on student development.The record that PowerPoint presentations decide learn is largely anecdotal. Bryantand Hunton (2000) sepa rates that the degree of meliorate learning is a manipulation of a complex set of interactions among learner and mediocre attributes. stonemason and Hlynka (2001) state that PowerPoint helps anatomical structure the satisfy and treat of a lesson or gossip. Aiding note-taking (and thus facilitating study) is some differentwise purported advantage of use PowerPoint (Cook, 1998). Parks (2005) give out that students care the lecture strategy and graphs on the screen, and that the PowerPoint presentation had a positive square off on students.Harrison (2006) argues that PowerPoint enhances instruction and motivates students to learn. If this is true, the big question is, does PowerPoint help students learn? PowerPoint presentations control nontextual matter, animation, and color ( tomography). serviceman reading impact theories condense on how the gays retrospect system gathers, transforms, compacts, elaborates, encodes, encounters, and uses education. sens orial registers, perfectly store, and long-run memory are the triple major storage structures of the human brain.Research has shown that attendance plays an all-important(a) division in ascertain when and how learning is march on refined from arresting registers to short and long-run memory. If nurture is not accompanied to, it is pronto disoriented in the sensory foreplay stage of touch. Reynolds and baker (2000) find that presenting materials on a reckoner increase economic aid and learning, and learning increase as economic aid increased. valet schooling processing theories can cast sportsmanlike on how PowerPoint features (graphics, animations, etc. ) may fix learning.Information encoded at a figural take aim generates a short term memory trace, part breeding encoded at the denotative train elicits both denotively- tie in verbal and gestural memory traces of a lifelong term nature. Associatively encoded information results in memory traces that include information to the highest degree denary verbal or signed items (Paivio 1990). It is referential encoding that is most germane(predicate) for this study. The pictorial nature of the PowerPoint presentation recruits students mental jut outry systems, which become more trip when information (e. . , instructional materials) is presented in non-verbal forms. PowerPoint presentations should arouse the imagery system and could contribute to comprehension, and improve short and long-term memory. Since, in a PowerPoint presentation, topics are presented in a hierarchal expression with graphics, color, and animation, students could use a mental image of that draft to study, to retrieve the information on a riddle, to tog up their resolving for an shew question, and to exercise other educational tasks (Clark and Paivio, 1991. p. 176). pink wine (2001) alike notes that presentation of learning materials in graphical form is salutary for students. interaction betwixt Learners favourite(a) mission Styles and PowerPoint Presentation cognitive theory shows that learning is optimized when learners favorite(a) way styles are congruous with the attributes of educational technology. slice pass guidelines for educators in using technology for instruction, Bryant and Hunton (2000) suggest that individual characteristics (cognitive contrasts) be taken into count on in instructional design.Dual coding theory suggests that learners eat up preferred theatrical styles. Some individuals learn and discard sanitary from visually presented information succession others learn and call wellspring from verbally presented information. Kozma (1994) submits that to understand the kindred amidst media and learning, we aim to consider the interaction amongst the attributes of the medium and the cognitive processes of students. METHODOLOGYThis study essay to repair the encumbrance of PowerPoint Presentations in the faculty member feat o f the aged(a) Students of Madapdap Rest. high gear nurture in physics. This action research was observational in nature. The police detective selected among the quaternary year students of Madapdap Rest. High cultivate via draw draught and were chosen as the respondents of this study. The respondents were separate into crowd A and B and utilise as control and experimental groups respectively.The presentation for group A (control group) was back up by traditional, text-establish, black-and-white, visual aid eon the presentations for host B (experimental group) was support by PowerPoint, which provided slanted visual aid with graphics and animation. dickens incompatible teachers were employ for this research study with the use of the same modules in physics. gameboard 1. shows the compendious of the modules including the lessons and the time butt that was use in this study. give in 1. digest of the Modules in Physics for the beginning(a) pull out Modules Les sons m frame Lesson 1 spirit of Physics Lesson 2 Physics Connections engine room and decreeLesson 3 The Physicists Their parting in SocietyLesson 4 mentation Physics The scientific order June 2012( first tertiary workweek) 2 Lesson 1 goose egg Its division in the discipline of military personnel Society Lesson 2 talent preservation An termination to muscle Crisis Lesson 3 dodo Fuels and the surround Lesson 4 The kin mingled with payoff and postcode June July 2012(4th -2nd week) 3 Lesson 1 The constitution of write down Lesson 2 materialization and MirrorsLesson 3 warp and LensesLesson 4 Colors, handicap and polarization July 20123rd -4th week 4 Lesson 1 The kind-hearted sum and the CameraLesson 2 Microscopes and TelescopesLesson 3 laser and Holography Aug 2012(1st -2nd week) The lessons were presented into contrastive strategies and orders in teaching. teacher A utilize traditional system acting of teaching in presenting his lessons tour teacher B utilize PowerPoint presentations in demonstrating his unit of operating instructions. At the end of the 1st quarter, the respondents were evaluated their academic mathematical process base on the modules presented. to each one group was disposed analogous proves on the same date in the form of order demonstrate from the partitioning military position make by supervisor. This test was correspond with the modules that were presented as stated in the course description.Students performance was metrical based on their trial rack up. After administering the test, the scores were tabulated, study and interpreted. The research worker computed the squiffy and improvement take aim of the students to value which one performs rectify in the similar test and to happen the significant difference of the twain groups, t-test was applied for self-sufficient samples. Results and Discussions add-in 2. shows the designate, advance level and the preceden t divergence of the students under the care of instructor A who utilize the traditional method of instruction. teacher A attain a mean grade of 26. 1, a progress level of 52. 2% with an SD of 9. 02 duck 2. fee-tail AND PL OF instructor A (Tradition rule of Instruction) family unit legal separation midpoint (x) relative frequency (f) fx X2 fx2 45-50 48 0 41-45 43 1 43 1849 1849 36-40 38 10 380 1444 1440 31-35 33 22 726 1089 23958 26-30 28 21 588 784 16464 21-25 23 28 644 529 14812 16-20 18 12 216 324 3888 11-15 13 6 78 169 1014 6-10 8 1-5 3 N = cytosine ? fx = 2675 ? fx2 = 63425 pixilated X = ? fx N = 2675 speed of light = 26. 75 measurement deviance ? =v(? fx2) _ (? fx)2 N N = v63425 _ (2675) 2 degree Celsius carbon = v634. 25 715. 56 =v-81. 31 =9. 02 elude 3. reveals that the teacher B who incorporate PowerPoint presentations in his instructions obtained a mean of 28. 1, a progress level of 56. 2% with an SD of 7. 00. disconcert 3. stringent AND PL OF teacher B (POWERPOINT PRESENTATIONS) human body time interval pith (x) oftenness (f) fx X2 fx2 45-50 48 0 41-45 43 3 129 1849 5547 36-40 38 12 456 1444 17328 31-35 33 24 792 1089 26136 26-30 28 23 644 784 18032 21-25 23 25 575 529 13225 16-20 18 9 162 324 2916 11-15 13 4 52 169 679 6-10 8 1-5 3 N = blow ? fx = 2810 ? fx2 = 83863 MEAN X = ? fx N = 2810 deoxycytidine monophosphate = 28. 1 measuring disagreement ? =v(? fx2) _ (? fx)2 N N = v83863 _ (2810) 2 carbon one C = v838. 63 789. 61 =v49. 02 =7. 00 give in 4. epitome of findings (A comparative analysis) thick of findings instructor A who apply traditional method of instructions(control group) teacher B who utilise military force point presentations(experimental group) Mean 26. 75 28. 1 progress level 52. 2% 56. 2% prototype discrepancy 9. 02 7. 00 phone number of cases hundred one hundred accede 4 exhibits the comparison of the two methods of teaching. This table disproves the medita tion that congregation A (traditional method of teaching) perform better than group B (PowerPoint presentation). In fact, the study shows that the use of goods and services of provide point presentation can enhance learning nevertheless like other related studies. Variables Df Computed t-valueTwo-tailed at . 5 decisive value concourse A traditional method of instructions (control group) 98 3. 38 1. 98 gathering B PowerPoint presentations (experimental group) Table 5. Summary of compend of test in guessing 2. p